Mcclung v doosan babcock ltd and others
Web17 feb. 2024 · Country: Scotland. Jurisdiction code: Unfair Dismissal. Decision date: 26 August 2024. Read the full decision in Mr W Ross v Doosan Babcock Ltd: 4107603/2024 - Dismissal. Published 17 February 2024. Web6 okt. 2024 · In this case, Mr McClung had been a supporter of Glasgow Rangers Football Club for most of his life. When he was dismissed in 2024, he brought tribunal claims for …
Mcclung v doosan babcock ltd and others
Did you know?
Webthrough his personal services company, McClung Strategy and Projects Ltd, 15 and was neither an employee of the second respondent or the first respondent. Third Respondent …
Web15 nov. 2024 · Mr McClung (“M”) worked as a subcontractor for Doosan Babcock (DB) and claimed a manager at DB denied him further work because she was a Glasgow Celtic fan. As any football fan worth their … Web14 nov. 2024 · Charlotte adds: “Mr McClung had also been offended by a colleague at Doosan Babcock when they said that ‘he was unusually okay for a Rangers fan’. “The …
Web22 sep. 2024 · McClung v Doosan Babcock Ltd & Others [2024] Posted In: Case Law. Decision Number 4110538/2024 Legal Body Employment Tribunal (ET) Type of Claim … WebThis is why I love my job - there is something new every day including this Scottish case which found that supporting Rangers did not amount to a protected...
WebIn the case of Mr E McClung v Doosan Babcock Ltd and others, an ardent supporter of Glasgow Rangers Football Club [“Rangers FC”] claimed that his support for the club was a philosophical belief.He thus felt it should be recognised as a protected characteristic under the Equality Act 2010. This was rejected by the Employment Tribunal.
WebMcClung v Doosan Babcock; McClung v Doosan Babcock. Filters. Summary. The Employment Tribunal has ruled that support for a football club (in this case, Rangers) is not tantamount to a religious or philosophical belief, ... Croner-i Limited 240 Blackfriars Road London SE1 8NW United Kingdom. richard dawkins contact informationWebMr E McClung Claimant In Person Doosan Babcock Ltd First Respondent Represented by: Ms L Miller - Solicitor NRL Ltd Second Respondent Represented by: Mr D Livingston … redlands mesa golf clubWeb22 sep. 2024 · An employee’s support of a football club did not amount to a protected philosophical belief within the meaning of the Equality Act 2010. Case: McClung v Doosan Babcock Ltd and others 2024 Mr McClung had supported Rangers Football Club (Rangers) for 42 years, was a member of the club and received annual birthday cards … redlands mesa golf real estateWeb21 mrt. 2024 · This is why I love my job - there is something new every day including this Scottish case which found that supporting Rangers did not amount to a protected philosophical belief within the meaning ... redlands methodist church cross junction vaWeb16 nov. 2024 · The ET in McClung v Doosan Babcock Ltd held that the claimant’s lifelong support for a football club (in this case, Glasgow Rangers) was not a protected philosophical belief under the Equality Act 2010. Therefore, Mr McClung could not bring claims for discrimination or harassment on this basis. This result is positive for employers, … richard dawkins criticismWeb28 okt. 2024 · Mr McClung is self-employed through his company McClung Strategy and Projects Ltd and carried out work for energy construction firm Doosan Babcock via recruiters NRL from January to June in 2024. richard dawkins cytatyWeb30 sep. 2024 · The McClung v Doosan Babcock case demonstrates that a discrimination claim can be raised about issues that aren't even explicitly related to a protected … richard dawkins deceitful editing